• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

section 92 of the cca 1974/repossession

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: section 92 of the cca 1974/repossession

    Originally posted by diddydicky View Post
    you mentioned that a "bailiff" removed the vehicle

    a bailiff can indeed enter private land not belonging to the hirer of the car to recover it
    Originally posted by diddydicky View Post


    any dispute as to whether he tresspassed in order to do so- would be an argument between the land owner and the bailiff and not between the hirer and the creditor (IMO)


    (IMO) Vs (FACT)

    92.—(1) Except under an order of the court, the creditor or owner shall not be entitled to enter any premises to take possession of goods subject to a regulated hire-purchase agreement, regulated conditional sale agreement or regulated consumer hire agreement.

    (3) An entry in contravention of subsection (1) or (2) is actionable as a breach of statutory duty.

    Not a dig just a fact

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: section 92 of the cca 1974/repossession

      Thanks People, Keep It Comming

      THIS IS A FICTIONAL EVENT THIS SINARIO

      What I Am Trying To Do Is Do A Draft Template Of A Pertic Of Claim For Breach Of S.92

      What Has Not Been Mentioned So Far Is The Recourse Set In S.140 Of The Cca For Good Measure

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: section 92 of the cca 1974/repossession

        Originally posted by dave27 View Post


        (IMO) Vs (FACT)

        92.—(1) Except under an order of the court, the creditor or owner shall not be entitled to enter any premises to take possession of goods subject to a regulated hire-purchase agreement, regulated conditional sale agreement or regulated consumer hire agreement.

        (3) An entry in contravention of subsection (1) or (2) is actionable as a breach of statutory duty.

        Not a dig just a fact

        that is quite correct, however if a bailiff is involved then a court order has been obtained already

        as i said a bailiff (not the creditor or owner) can act as i described

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: section 92 of the cca 1974/repossession

          correct

          the key is court order
          s.92 (1)

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: section 92 of the cca 1974/repossession

            92.—(1) Except under an order of the court, the creditor or owner shall not be entitled to enter any premises to take possession of goods subject to a regulated hire-purchase agreement, regulated conditional sale agreement or regulated consumer hire agreement.

            (3) An entry in contravention of subsection (1) or (2) is actionable as a breach of statutory duty.



            Has the agreement in question been terminated? If it has, there is a strong argument that the goods will NO LONGER be subject to a Hire Purchase agreement (which has of course been terminated) and s.92 will no longer apply, particularly given that the debtor in question has lost the option to be entitled to take ownership of the goods.

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: section 92 of the cca 1974/repossession

              Originally posted by napoleon-dynamite View Post
              92.—(1) Except under an order of the court, the creditor or owner shall not be entitled to enter any premises to take possession of goods subject to a regulated hire-purchase agreement, regulated conditional sale agreement or regulated consumer hire agreement.

              (3) An entry in contravention of subsection (1) or (2) is actionable as a breach of statutory duty.



              Has the agreement in question been terminated? If it has, there is a strong argument that the goods will NO LONGER be subject to a Hire Purchase agreement (which has of course been terminated) and s.92 will no longer apply, particularly given that the debtor in question has lost the option to be entitled to take ownership of the goods.



              As to Section 92, paragraph 3. Even if the Creditor has a Court order, the creditor can not breach any laws or rules by way of entry. I believe Section 92 is still a grey area that can be argued based on circumstances.

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: section 92 of the cca 1974/repossession

                it was terminated due to the vehicle not being of satisfactory quality

                - - - Updated - - -

                The Creditor was aware the vehicle is not stored on my property, there were also vulnerable people at the property. The entered to make threats, by virtue of section 92

                - - - Updated - - -

                it was not a baliff but rather the creditor who entered my property

                Comment

                View our Terms and Conditions

                LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                Working...
                X