Tweet
For the moment we are recommending asking for a stay to negotiate. If its found your POC needs amending this will also give a bit more time to organise that properly.
Thus:
AQ (N149)
A - Yes (postpone for a month to discuss settlement - give you a bit of breathing space to see what the OFT intends to do regarding the test case basically)
B - straightforward - your local court if its not there already.
C - small claims track - YES
D - 0
E - no
F - straightforward
G - Other information - ''Following the recent judgment by the Supreme Court (25th November 2009) Case [2009] UKSC 6 (On appeal from: [2009] EWCA Civ 116 ) it is extremely likely that further litigation will follow, either between the OFT and the defendant or otherwise to generally decide the issues. I therefore respectfully submit that it would be appropriate for the Court to apply a general stay in this claim pending resolution of the issues raised.''
H - yes, unless you are exempt but you tick yes anyway and attach an EX160 if you are
I - sign it.
Thus:
AQ (N149)
A - Yes (postpone for a month to discuss settlement - give you a bit of breathing space to see what the OFT intends to do regarding the test case basically)
B - straightforward - your local court if its not there already.
C - small claims track - YES
D - 0
E - no
F - straightforward
G - Other information - ''Following the recent judgment by the Supreme Court (25th November 2009) Case [2009] UKSC 6 (On appeal from: [2009] EWCA Civ 116 ) it is extremely likely that further litigation will follow, either between the OFT and the defendant or otherwise to generally decide the issues. I therefore respectfully submit that it would be appropriate for the Court to apply a general stay in this claim pending resolution of the issues raised.''
H - yes, unless you are exempt but you tick yes anyway and attach an EX160 if you are
I - sign it.
Comment