• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

MIKE770 v Capital One

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: MIKE770 v Capital One

    Depends on status of account Mike.

    If account is within credit limit or close to it and regular payments are being made then I believe that Capital One would normally send full settlement to you. Each case is reviewed on its own merits, even if settlement is made as a result of court action. I will review your thread to remind myself of the background to your claim.

    Budgie

    Comment


    • Re: MIKE770 v Capital One

      Originally posted by Budgie View Post
      Depends on status of account Mike.

      If account is within credit limit or close to it and regular payments are being made then I believe that Capital One would normally send full settlement to you. Each case is reviewed on its own merits, even if settlement is made as a result of court action. I will review your thread to remind myself of the background to your claim.

      Budgie

      Is in Budgie.CCA dispute

      Comment


      • Re: MIKE770 v Capital One

        Copy letter from OMB:-

        Capital One Bank Plc., As you know, the bank made a previous offer of £352.00 + £94.58 interest to you (2nd Offer), an attempt to resolve your complaint about credit card charges. However you told us that the offer was not acceptable because it did not represent a refund of the charges and interest that you feel is due.

        In light of your comments, I contacted the bank to see if it would be prepared to revise its offer, but it is not prepared to do so because it says that the offer already includes the interest that is likely to have accrued on the charges. By way of further explanation, interest on the charges would have accrued as a proportion of purchase interest.

        The Bank says that your total charges (£352.00) represent 8.41 parts of total purchases (£2,609.47) & therefore it would be appropriate to refund this proportion of total purchase interest (£795.76). The bank says this would mean a refund of £94.58 of interest which is the amount that has already been offered.


        I also note that you are claiming £438.00) of charges. However, this service can only look at charges applied to the account for six years prior to the complaint being raised. You have said on the complaint form that the complaint was first raised in August 2009. Therefore Capital One has advised us that the above offer is a full refund of default charges for the six years prior to complaint being raised.

        If you would now like to accept the banks offer of settlement, pls sign attached letter, within 14 days (sent 8 January 2010) Alternatively, if the proposed settlement still appears to fall short of your claim let us know the details of what remains outstanding. If I do not hear from you in 14 days, I will assume that you do not wish to accept the banks offer & will close my file accordingly.
        ------------------------------- merged -------------------------------
        Originally posted by MIKE770 View Post
        Copy letter from OMB:-

        Capital One Bank Plc., As you know, the bank made a previous offer of £352.00 + £94.58 interest to you (2nd Offer), an attempt to resolve your complaint about credit card charges. However you told us that the offer was not acceptable because it did not represent a refund of the charges and interest that you feel is due.

        In light of your comments, I contacted the bank to see if it would be prepared to revise its offer, but it is not prepared to do so because it says that the offer already includes the interest that is likely to have accrued on the charges. By way of further explanation, interest on the charges would have accrued as a proportion of purchase interest.

        The Bank says that your total charges (£352.00) represent 8.41 parts of total purchases (£2,609.47) & therefore it would be appropriate to refund this proportion of total purchase interest (£795.76). The bank says this would mean a refund of £94.58 of interest which is the amount that has already been offered.


        I also note that you are claiming £438.00) of charges. However, this service can only look at charges applied to the account for six years prior to the complaint being raised. You have said on the complaint form that the complaint was first raised in August 2009. Therefore Capital One has advised us that the above offer is a full refund of default charges for the six years prior to complaint being raised.

        If you would now like to accept the banks offer of settlement, pls sign attached letter, within 14 days (sent 8 January 2010) Alternatively, if the proposed settlement still appears to fall short of your claim let us know the details of what remains outstanding. If I do not hear from you in 14 days, I will assume that you do not wish to accept the banks offer & will close my file accordingly.

        Copy of Ombudsman letter reffered to above.
        Last edited by MIKE770; 15th January 2010, 16:11:PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

        Comment


        • Re: MIKE770 v Capital One

          Originally posted by MIKE770 View Post
          Copy letter from OMB:-

          Capital One Bank Plc., As you know, the bank made a previous offer of £352.00 + £94.58 interest to you (2nd Offer), an attempt to resolve your complaint about credit card charges. However you told us that the offer was not acceptable because it did not represent a refund of the charges and interest that you feel is due.

          In light of your comments, I contacted the bank to see if it would be prepared to revise its offer, but it is not prepared to do so because it says that the offer already includes the interest that is likely to have accrued on the charges. By way of further explanation, interest on the charges would have accrued as a proportion of purchase interest.

          The Bank says that your total charges (£352.00) represent 8.41 parts of total purchases (£2,609.47) & therefore it would be appropriate to refund this proportion of total purchase interest (£795.76). The bank says this would mean a refund of £94.58 of interest which is the amount that has already been offered.


          I also note that you are claiming £438.00) of charges. However, this service can only look at charges applied to the account for six years prior to the complaint being raised. You have said on the complaint form that the complaint was first raised in August 2009. Therefore Capital One has advised us that the above offer is a full refund of default charges for the six years prior to complaint being raised.

          If you would now like to accept the banks offer of settlement, pls sign attached letter, within 14 days (sent 8 January 2010) Alternatively, if the proposed settlement still appears to fall short of your claim let us know the details of what remains outstanding. If I do not hear from you in 14 days, I will assume that you do not wish to accept the banks offer & will close my file accordingly.
          ------------------------------- merged -------------------------------



          Copy of Ombudsman letter reffered to above.
          Budgie??????


          BUMP

          Comment


          • Re: MIKE770 v Capital One

            163/162 for my ref:

            Comment


            • Re: MIKE770 v Capital One

              Hi Mike

              I can't upload the .bmp file (and am not sure how to convert bnp to jpg ? )
              #staysafestayhome

              Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

              Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

              Comment


              • Re: MIKE770 v Capital One

                WELL Lowells letter to-day stating they have bought the alledged debt and that Capital one state no reason why unpaid ,( outstanding charges issue also CCA 1974 issue outstanding as reported in earlier post),

                Default nearly off CRA file in 2 months albeit there is a payment record in to the following year, but the charges issue was never settled as I would not agree to their figures, which Budge stated was incorrect at the time, and the spreadsheet amount is a lot more now =Basically £4,201, they are claiming £4300, so account sold in dispute, as been thru FOS in the past who state that Cap one offered as previous but no accepted by me as Budgie stated more now even a lot more. FOS were informed that I do not accept capital one figures.

                Comment


                • Re: MIKE770 v Capital One

                  Originally posted by MIKE770 View Post
                  WELL Lowells letter to-day stating they have bought the alledged debt and that Capital one state no reason why unpaid ,( outstanding charges issue also CCA 1974 issue outstanding as reported in earlier post),

                  Default nearly off CRA file in 2 months albeit there is a payment record in to the following year, but the charges issue was never settled as I would not agree to their figures, which Budge stated was incorrect at the time, and the spreadsheet amount is a lot more now =Basically £4,201, they are claiming £4300, so account sold in dispute, as been thru FOS in the past who state that Cap one offered as previous but no accepted by me as Budgie stated more now even a lot more. FOS were informed that I do not accept capital one figures.
                  Hey Mike, I got the same!!! What are you doing about it? Mines been in default due to an incorrect agreement since approx 2009. It was due to go from my credit report in oct also!
                  :beagle:My threads :- UCA (Amex) : Moorcroft (Goldfish) : Cabot : Marlins : Shas v A&L & the world : Capital One : Direct Legal Collections...Egg, CO : Nationwide : Co-Op

                  Comment


                  • Re: MIKE770 v Capital One

                    Hi our Shaz, family o.k.? yours and mine (Default) the same time, they are chasing last minute many of us so do not acknowledge debt, we have to wait until after default date drops off, so we are awaiting the next letters and bidding our time, your CCA1974 like mine if I remember correctly is bad as the Prescribed terms as per para 8 were not present at inception,.

                    also default charges?


                    a lot of us received LOW101 & LOW106 then LOW101 part 2, seems a couple more then Red nonsence etc keep an eye on the Capital one/Lowell threads Shaz,!

                    Comment


                    • Re: MIKE770 v Capital One

                      Looked @ Noddle to-day and low & behold the Default Capital One has gone, original default letter was dated 8th September 2008????

                      Comment


                      • Re: MIKE770 v Capital One

                        Hmmm just checked mine & it's still there! Says it's be in reported until October 2014
                        :beagle:My threads :- UCA (Amex) : Moorcroft (Goldfish) : Cabot : Marlins : Shas v A&L & the world : Capital One : Direct Legal Collections...Egg, CO : Nationwide : Co-Op

                        Comment


                        • Re: MIKE770 v Capital One

                          Originally posted by MIKE770 View Post
                          Looked @ Noddle to-day and low & behold the Default Capital One has gone, original default letter was dated 8th September 2008????
                          Well Lowells have put the default back on Noddle report 13/09/2014, should fall off CRA file next month. but old address listed, yet they send letters to new address.

                          Comment


                          • Re: MIKE770 v Capital One

                            Lowell's are now named on mine too (due to drop off October) but they've now sent me a letter saying the account is on hold because of my complaint.....I haven't actually complained, I just emailed them saying the accounts in default & has been since 2009!
                            :beagle:My threads :- UCA (Amex) : Moorcroft (Goldfish) : Cabot : Marlins : Shas v A&L & the world : Capital One : Direct Legal Collections...Egg, CO : Nationwide : Co-Op

                            Comment

                            View our Terms and Conditions

                            LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                            If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                            If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                            Working...
                            X