Sec78 request to. Whom?

**Diana M** · 24th November 2017, 22:45:PM

Re: How concerned should I be?

Originally posted by Onestepatatime View Post

@Diana M
this is the link
This is the first link
http://legalbeagles.info/forums/show...011#post743011

Second link

http://legalbeagles.info/forums/showthread.php?100727-Drydensfairfax-help!

It may make sense to ask @Kati to merge your threads so help can be given based on the history of your account/debt.

Di

**Onestepatatime** · 24th November 2017, 22:52:PM

Re: How concerned should I be?

That would perhaps be good, I struggle with this forum to find all my posts so invariably end up starting a new one.

**Onestepatatime** · 24th November 2017, 23:11:PM

Re: Sec78 request to. Whom?

Thanks Kati x

**Kati** · 24th November 2017, 23:12:PM

Re: How concerned should I be?

Originally posted by Diana M View Post

It may make sense to ask @Kati to merge your threads so help can be given based on the history of your account/debt.

Di

Originally posted by Onestepatatime View Post

That would perhaps be good, I struggle with this forum to find all my posts so invariably end up starting a new one.

doneded

xx

**Onestepatatime** · 25th November 2017, 12:35:PM

Re: Sec78 request to. Whom?

So now that our Kati has obliged in merging threads, for we have advise on how to move this forward?
I was thinking of writing to DF saying that AGGL haven't complied with my sec77-79 request is that worthwhile?

**warwick65** · 25th November 2017, 21:14:PM

Re: Sec78 request to. Whom?

I'm not ignoring you and hopefully [MENTION=87380]Diana M[/MENTION] can explain better than I can the pros and cons.

I do not know the M.O. OD Dryden and if they will issue a claim regardless.
If you tell them there is no response to a cca request either they will poke AG to get a move on and issue regardless or they may wait.

If you don't tell them they may just issue anyway.

Is this anywhere near being Statute barred? Obviously SB is the best defence but by the sounds of it a good solicitor can argue about the licensing issue.

Sorry if that's as much use as a chocolate teapot

**Onestepatatime** · 25th November 2017, 22:16:PM

Re: Sec78 request to. Whom?

Sadly not close to SB so not an option.

**Onestepatatime** · 26th November 2017, 20:30:PM

Re: Sec78 request to. Whom?

[MENTION=87380]Diana M[/MENTION] [MENTION=551]pt2537[/MENTION] and anyone who can give sound advice please?

**Onestepatatime** · 27th November 2017, 18:32:PM

Re: Sec78 request to. Whom?

Anybody? Please don't dessert me in my hour of need, I've not got this far before and am now getting a little nervous.
One part of me says they still haven't complied with the cca request however another part of me is concerned I may have missed something.

**warwick65** · 27th November 2017, 18:37:PM

Re: Sec78 request to. Whom?

Have you tried contacting anyone directly?

Diana m has an email address in her signature.

**Onestepatatime** · 27th November 2017, 19:14:PM

Re: Sec78 request to. Whom?

'Twas my next option!

**warwick65** · 27th November 2017, 19:26:PM

Re: Sec78 request to. Whom?

It's a substantial amount so needs some focus on your part. I always feel creditors are less likely to roll over on higher amounts simply because it becomes more financially viable. Don't want to worry you just managing expectations.

By the way creditors often sail very close to the wind on what the can and cannot get away with.

**Onestepatatime** · 28th November 2017, 12:35:PM

Re: Sec78 request to. Whom?

[MENTION=87380]Diana M[/MENTION] I have sent you a mail.