• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

FCA tells DCAs they must explain court cases

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • FCA tells DCAs they must explain court cases

    From today's Times.

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/b...ases-lnwbwsfd6

    Debt firms must explain court cases

    Debt collectors have been told by their trade association that the Financial Conduct Authority wants more information on how they use litigation to pursue consumers in arrears.

    The Credit Services Association sent an email to its members last week saying that they should expect a request on a number of matters, such as use of legal action.

    At the CSA conference Philip Salter, the FCA’s director of retail lending, outlined what debt collectors, many of which are FCA-authorised, should expect as part of its “business as usual supervisory approach”.

    He said that the FCA was also interested in monitoring complaints handling, remuneration, staff incentives as well as the quality of data transfer between firms and creditors.

    Mr Salter also reminded debt collectors who buy bad consumer debt portfolios from banks at a discount and then attempt to collect the outstanding payments that they should take litigation action only when it was “appropriate to do so”. He said that they should also ensure that they had appropriate processes in place to return money to customers who had overpaid.

    Litigation can be abused, as when Wonga, the payday loans company, used fake lawyers’ letters in 2013 to put pressure borrowers to make repayments. That led to a regulatory crackdown on the firm.

    There is evidence of debt collectors’ increasingly using litigation. Arrow Global, the listed debt collector, disclosed last week when it reported its third-quarter earnings that it had spent £16 million in nine months on “legal cost investment”.

    Many debt collectors such as Lowell and Cabot Credit Management, which pulled its initial public offering last week, have been developing their own in-house legal services. In a prospectus for a 2016 Cabot debt sale, it said that in the 20 years to 2014 it had obtained about 200,000 judgments. By the end of June last year the figure had risen to more than half a million. The rise was mostly driven by Cabot’s purchase of Marlin, a specialist law firm.

    One source said that most debt collectors had strict guidelines for ensuring the appropriate use of litigation but said: “The key thing here is you have to be able to show that if you did take legal action it was the last course of action after all other avenues were exhausted.”

    Peter Wallwork, chief executive of the CSA, said that the CSA “was recently praised for continuing to improve standards”, and added: “All members abide by the CSA’s code of practice and, where appropriate, are fully FCA authorised demonstrating that they have the appropriate business practices in place and put treating customers fairly at the heart of their service.”
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Re: FCA tells DCAs they must explain court cases

    I saw this in the Times this am today as well.

    It does seem that authorities are getting annoyed by the debt purchasing business.

    However, the guidelines such as:
    “The key thing here is you have to be able to show that if you did take legal action it was the last course of action after all other avenues were exhausted.”
    It would be easy to justify that in a majority of cases, I would have thought. If the alleged debtor not responding and not paying up to requests? I would have thought it would have been better for the guidelines to say " only if you have the correct documentation in place" something like that. Or if it's a statute barred debt that they will not be able to threaten or use litigation.

    I don't know what other people think?
    Last edited by sidley; 20th November 2017, 10:09:AM.

    Comment

    View our Terms and Conditions

    LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

    If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


    If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
    Working...
    X