• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.
  • If you need direct help with your employment issue you can contact us at admin@legalbeaglesgroup.com for further assistance. This will give you access to “off-forum” support on a one-to- one basis from an experienced employment law expert for which we would welcome that you make a donation to help towards their time spent assisting on your matter. You can do this by clicking on the donate button in the box below.

Can respondant be struck out

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Can respondant be struck out

    Hi last week at 3rd hearing at tribunal i found out that the company had changed providor on 3/2/2017 and oat hearing in may had us change name i put on et1 so we did when i told judge about change and name id put on et1 was the new name They said they intended mentioning this at they end i dought they would if i haddent checked cqc report and seen they changed during acas and appeal process but for 8 mnth tried all sorts strike me out . Can they do this my claim is s15 and s20 21 eqa2010 and liability for injury to health thankyou .
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Re: Can respondant be struck out

    Changed provider of what ? Representation in the case ?
    #staysafestayhome

    Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

    Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Can respondant be struck out

      Originally posted by Amethyst View Post
      Changed provider of what ? Representation in the case ?
      Changed care providors in feb this year during grievance i told them i was contacting acas as they was draggin it till et1 bein sent The care providor had changed when et 3 was accepted but had wat id put as respondant changed in may 17 at plim hearing iv only found out last week the name respondant had us change wasnt the new providor but the one before transfer when i said about this at tribunal she said they was going to mention the change I know all bank staff are perminant since the change . Sorry theres loads to case under eqa2010 im at end of my tether nt noing if things are write or wrong throughout i just wanted the treatment thanks ps a different solicitor came the one last week but under same firm im struggling with them uderstanding the wat arose bit for s15 or ther doing things diliberate thankyou

      Comment

      View our Terms and Conditions

      LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

      If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


      If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.

      Announcement

      Collapse

      Welcome to LegalBeagles


      Donate with PayPal button

      LegalBeagles is a free forum, founded in May 2007, providing legal guidance and support to consumers and SME's across a range of legal areas.

      See more
      See less

      Court Claim ?

      Guides and Letters
      Loading...



      Search and Compare fixed fee legal services and find a solicitor near you.

      Find a Law Firm


      Working...
      X