• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum. Please register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
  • Please note that LegalBeagles is a public forum and the main areas are accessible to all, and as such, please take care your username or posts do not identify you. There is no need to post claim numbers, names or precise amounts to get support with your case. When uploading documents please ensure that you have properly redacted your personal details. Thank you.

Thanks Legal Beagles

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Thanks Legal Beagles

    I wanted to post a success story. I had 2 credit cards with First Direct, on which I have been paying PPI. The first card was opened in 1994, and was replaced by an upgraded card in 2000. It was only late last year that I actually questioned the policy - I didn't think all those PPI adverts applied to me. When I checked all my paperwork etc., it seemed to me that I had not asked for the insurance. I am a public sector worker and had savings all the time I have had the cards. I completed the FOS form and eventually received a reply saying they would consider the claim for the first card if I could send proof of employment terms and proof of savings, as the application form had a pre-ticked box, but rejected the claim for the second, saying that I had ticked the box myself, could have cancelled the policy, and had not queried it in all the years it had been active. (see letter posted by jazzyjemjem 31/01/12 - mine was virtually identical). I initially thought that was that, but then I found this forum. I realised what I had been sent was a standard "fob off" letter, and I was able to counter their reasons for rejection one by one using advice found here, including the guidelines from the FSA Handbook. They had sent me copies of the original application forms, and both showed that the insurance was recommended; I included with my letter proof of employment terms and proof of savings for the time of taking out both cards. Within a week my complaint had been upheld. After checking their calculations with the spreadsheet found on the forum, they look correct, so I am about to sign and return their form accepting over 8k redress. So thank you Legal Beagles, very much. I should also note that First Direct is a good bank and I love them - in 20 years this is the only time I have had cause to complain to them. And in spite of the initial rejection letter, they have dealt with my complaint quickly and have accepted that their initial decision was flawed. Can't say fairer than that. I'll keep checking back for a few weeks - having some PC trouble at the moment and can't always get online, but if anyone thinks my "appeal" letter might help them send me a message and I'll try to attach it within this thread (if someone tells me how).
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Re: Thanks Legal Beagles

    Very well done JG and hope that you will stick around Legal Beagles to help others.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Thanks Legal Beagles

      Excellent and Thank You for letting us know, it's always rewarding to hear about victories!
      "Although scalar fields are Lorentz scalars, they may transform nontrivially under other symmetries, such as flavour or isospin. For example, the pion is invariant under the restricted Lorentz group, but is an isospin triplet (meaning it transforms like a three component vector under the SU(2) isospin symmetry). Furthermore, it picks up a negative phase under parity inversion, so it transforms nontrivially under the full Lorentz group; such particles are called pseudoscalar rather than scalar. Most mesons are pseudoscalar particles." (finally explained to a captivated Celestine by Professor Brian Cox on Wednesday 27th June 2012 )

      I am proud to have co-founded LegalBeagles in 2007

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Thanks Legal Beagles

        A good result for you, and a good recommendation for First Direct. I'd heard they were one of the better banks, but have never had to deal with them. Given what I spend my time doing, that, in itself is a good recommendation.

        Thanks for sharing it with us.

        Comment

        View our Terms and Conditions

        LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

        If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


        If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.

        Announcement

        Collapse
        No announcement yet.
        Loading...

        upgrade to vip

        Want exclusive access to forums, more privacy and a live chat box? Upgrade to become a bigger part of our community.

        only £15/yr

        Offers available. No subscription traps.

        sign up now



        Search and Compare fixed fee legal services and find a solicitor near you.

        Find a Law Firm


        Working...
        X