• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum. Please register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
  • Please note that LegalBeagles is a public forum and the main areas are accessible to all, and as such, please take care your username or posts do not identify you. There is no need to post claim numbers, names or precise amounts to get support with your case. When uploading documents please ensure that you have properly redacted your personal details. Thank you.

Power of Attorney resmission wants turnover figure?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Power of Attorney resmission wants turnover figure?

    Recently my husband and I applied for mutual Lasting Powers of Attorney, because we had seen the process elsewhere in the family and a legal friend advised that it is a good idea to have these in place even if you are not old and infirm.

    People with annual income of under 12,000 can apply for a "remission" (discount) of 50%, which would be 130 between the two of us.

    We applied for this with forms SA302 from HMRC, which certify your pre-tax income on the basis of your last tax returns.

    The Remissions department of the Office of the Public Guardian have refused this, saying we were misinformed (we weren't, we just read the instructions on the application process) and they need our TURNOVER figure to consider the application.

    They cannot explain (a kindly manager phoned me to try, though I have yet to receive a reply in writing) WHY someone working for themselves is to be assessed on the whole income of their business, instead of their personal income. I tried explaining that turnover is income before business costs and isn't drawable by individuals as their personal income (unless they want to go bankrupt quickly) but they have "internal guidelines" and that is the end of it. The view of HMRC on what your personal income (ie taxable income) is doesn't seem to matter. I cannot fathom why self employed people and small businesses should be treated in this way (it would never become an issue for the owner of a large business) nor can anyone explain to me. Yet the LPAs are an entirely personal registration, to give your next of kin permission to deal with your finances should you become incapacitated, not a business matter of any kind.

    Our turnover would "Just" exclude us from this remission, whereas our personal income is well below it.

    Someone somewhere perhaps knows what the thinking is behind this and why it is fair, but the gentleman at the OPG could not explain this, and neither can anyone else I have spoken to.

    (The actual LPAs have been registered OK.)

    Thank you for any pointers.
    Tags: None

View our Terms and Conditions

LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
Loading...

upgrade to vip

Want exclusive access to forums, more privacy and a live chat box? Upgrade to become a bigger part of our community.

only £15/yr

Offers available. No subscription traps.

sign up now



Search and Compare fixed fee legal services and find a solicitor near you.

Find a Law Firm


Working...
X