• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum. Please register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
  • Please note that LegalBeagles is a public forum and the main areas are accessible to all, and as such, please take care your username or posts do not identify you. There is no need to post claim numbers, names or precise amounts to get support with your case. When uploading documents please ensure that you have properly redacted your personal details. Thank you.

Local Government Finance Act 1992

Collapse
Important !
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Local Government Finance Act 1992

    http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts1992..._19920014_en_1

    Enforcement (Schedule 4):-

    http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts1992...014_en_13#sch4

    Schedule 1 - Installment Schemes

    The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992
    CAVEAT LECTOR

    This is only my opinion - "
    Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)

    You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
    Cohen, Herb

    There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
    gets his brain a-going.
    Phelps, C. C.

    "They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
    The last words of John Sedgwick

  • #2
    Re: Local Government Finance Act 1992

    Hi

    There are so many people being taken to court for late instalment payment of Council Tax. I have started an e-petition to get the Government to look at this unfair practice. For example, my local authority, Basildon Council raised 402,705 just this financial year and it is not even over yet. Here is their response to the question I asked from Freedom of Information (FOI) regarding extra revenue raised from summonses:

    How much extra revenue has been raised as a result of summonses being issued for non-payment of Council Tax?
    How much extra revenue has been raised as a result of summonses for late payment of Council Tax?


    Costs of 45 are charged for each summons that is issued. However, so far this financial year we have withdrawn 996 cases prior to the court hearing. These 996 cases will not be charged the 45 costs. Therefore the net costs raised are 402,705. However, not all of those costs will be recovered.

    That is a huge amount of money, costing further financial hardship to many families.

    When asked:
    How many summonses have been issued this financial year for non-payment of council tax?


    How many summonses have been issued this financial year for late payment of council tax?


    The regulations do not distinguish between customers who have paid some of their Council Tax and those that have paid none. We have issued 9945 summonses in total since 1 April 2012.


    Please click on the link below and sign the e-petition to stop this unfair practice.
    http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/43663

    Many thanks and lets hope we can make a change.

    Erathaf

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Local Government Finance Act 1992

      I just tried to sign your petition but it is closed. An interesting point to add to this is that every council must have a hardship scheme for which people can apply for help with their council tax. This is under the local Government Finance Act 1992 sec 13 A (1) (c). It would be useful if councils told people this. I can highly recommend The Council Tax Handbook, published by the Child Poverty Action Group and edited by Alan Murdie for this kind of information.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Local Government Finance Act 1992

        Hai - EVERYTHING councils / local government does controlled by statute . Liability order re Local gov act 1992 - is AFTER the summons issued ( magestrates court - crim court ) by the council not the court - with no statute on it - thus canot defend position - re that of statute . The Public and General acts - have been taken off theshelves of libraries - thus canmot get to source - only 'internet' - in effect a medium between that easily altered . I stood up in mags court six times told them it illegasl each of thosesix times - they could not maske the furthe step of making the objection criminal . Further back the acytual c-tax demand also as legislated postion - no statute on the demand - cannot reference that statute . Called orgamnised crime - but by goverment . " They " win - each time every time - as inventor - assigned the construction of kit which has military application to former communist country - quite legal - I own it . Estimated at a 30,million build with subsequent sales to about 100,million

        Comment

        View our Terms and Conditions

        LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

        If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


        If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.

        Announcement

        Collapse
        No announcement yet.
        Loading...

        upgrade to vip

        Want exclusive access to forums, more privacy and a live chat box? Upgrade to become a bigger part of our community.

        only £15/yr

        Offers available. No subscription traps.

        sign up now



        Search and Compare fixed fee legal services and find a solicitor near you.

        Find a Law Firm


        Working...
        X